Vizttax Services Pvt Ltd

Call Directions Website Contact the business

Vizttax Services Pvt Ltd Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Vizttax Services Pvt Ltd, Tax preparation service, Premise No 06, 1st Floor, Park End, Vikas Marg, Preet Vihar, Delhi.

The team of CA, CS & Corporate Advocates

Virtual CFO | Corporate Compliance | Startup Advisor | Financial Analyst | GCC Bookkeeping | Cross Border Advisory | Due Diligence | M&A | Corporate Tax | Income Tax | GST | Corporate Law | FEMA | IPR

🚨 Important Update for Tax Professionals & Assessees (AY 2026-27)The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued an ...
28/09/2026

🚨 Important Update for Tax Professionals & Assessees (AY 2026-27)

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued an official press release dated September 28, 2026, extending key compliance due dates for tax audit cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961:

📌 Tax Audit Report Submission:

Original Due Date: September 30, 2026

Extended Due Date: October 21, 2026

📌 Income Tax Return (ITR) Filing (for Tax Audit Cases):

Original Due Date: October 31, 2026

Extended Due Date: November 21, 2026

Applicability: This extension applies to taxpayers specified under S. No. 2 in the Table below Explanation 2 to sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

A formal order/notification confirming these extended dates is being issued separately by the CBDT.

Plan your audit schedules and compliance workflows accordingly to ensure smooth filing before the new deadlines.

📢 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐈𝐬 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐈𝐬𝐧'𝐭?Is your business generating more revenue every year, but your 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟...
26/09/2026

📢 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐈𝐬 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐈𝐬𝐧'𝐭?

Is your business generating more revenue every year, but your 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐥𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠?

Higher sales do not automatically mean a healthier business. Growth can sometimes come with shrinking margins, rising costs, cash-flow pressure, or low-quality revenue.

𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞, 𝐰𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝟗 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭:
1️⃣ 𝐒𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 & 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬
Growing sales through low-margin products, heavy discounts, or unfavorable contracts can reduce overall profitability.

2️⃣ 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠
Even a small reduction in price can significantly reduce your contribution per sale and force you to sell much more just to maintain the same profit.

3️⃣ 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐢𝐱
Not every high-revenue customer is a profitable customer. Support costs, customization, delayed payments, discounts, and logistics can affect customer-level profitability.

4️⃣ 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞
If employee, rent, infrastructure, marketing, and administrative costs are increasing faster than revenue, growth can actually weaken operating leverage.

5️⃣ 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐡
Your P&L may show a profit while cash remains locked in receivables and inventory. Debtor Days, Creditor Days, Inventory Days, and the Cash Conversion Cycle matter.

6️⃣ 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐋𝐨𝐰-𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞
One-time projects, highly discounted contracts, low-margin sales, and customer concentration may increase revenue without creating sustainable business value.

7️⃣ 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧
Expanding branches, teams, or operations before the core business model is financially efficient can multiply existing problems.

8️⃣ 𝐎𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐬 (𝐌𝐈𝐒)
Without timely visibility into margins, cash flow, receivables, working capital, CAC, LTV, and EBITDA, business owners may make decisions based on outdated numbers.

9️⃣ 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞
A larger top line does not necessarily mean a stronger business. Profitability, cash generation, capital efficiency, customer concentration, and long-term value also matter.

💡 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐤𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲:
𝐁𝐢𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫. Sustainable growth requires more than increasing sales—it requires healthy margins, strong cash flow, efficient working capital, quality revenue, and informed financial decision-making.

Before pushing for more sales, businesses should regularly review their 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥, 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐌𝐈𝐒, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞.

👉 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐞



GST REFUND ALREADY CLAIMED? YOU MAY STILL HAVE A DIFFERENTIAL REFUND CLAIM.Can a taxpayer claim additional GST refund af...
26/09/2026

GST REFUND ALREADY CLAIMED? YOU MAY STILL HAVE A DIFFERENTIAL REFUND CLAIM.

Can a taxpayer claim additional GST refund after an earlier refund has already been filed?

A recent ruling of GSTAT, Lucknow provides an important answer.

In Ajit Kumar Minz v. M/s B.L. Agro Industries Limited, decided on 17 September 2026, the Tribunal upheld relief of approximately ₹5.71 crore in supplementary/differential refund claims arising from an inverted duty structure.

Some important takeaways:

🔹 Supplementary refund claims: There is no blanket bar on filing a differential refund claim, provided the claim is within the limitation prescribed under Section 54 of the CGST Act.

🔹 Rule 89(5): The amended formula for calculating refund under an inverted duty structure was held applicable to eligible claims.

🔹 Circular vs. statutory provisions: A departmental circular cannot override the provisions of the CGST Act and Rules.

🔹 Portal limitations: A procedural or technical limitation on the GST portal cannot, by itself, defeat a refund that is otherwise legally admissible.

🔹 Classification disputes: Where classification requires examination, the appropriate course is verification and recomputation—not necessarily rejection of the entire refund claim.

📌 Practical takeaway:
If your earlier GST refund was calculated using an incorrect formula, classification, or other factor, it may be worth reviewing whether a differential refund claim remains legally available—particularly before the Section 54 limitation period expires.

Case: Ajit Kumar Minz v. M/s B.L. Agro Industries Limited
GSTAT, Lucknow | 17 September 2026

Vizttax Services Private Limited

🚨 **Exporting services from India? 1 October 2026 could change your FEMA compliance workflow.**If your business receives...
25/09/2026

🚨 **Exporting services from India? 1 October 2026 could change your FEMA compliance workflow.**

If your business receives payments from overseas for **consulting, freight, agency services, professional services, group recharges, IT services or other cross-border services**, there is a new compliance step you need to prepare for.

RBI’s **FEMA Export & Import Regulations, 2026** come into effect from **1 October 2026**.

The key change for service exporters?

📌 **Export Declaration Form (EDF)**

From 1 October:
• Service exports will be subject to EDF reporting.
• A single EDF can cover services exported to multiple overseas customers during a month.
• For services other than software, EDF may alternatively be submitted on or before receipt of payment.
• For DTA units, the EDF goes through the **Authorised Dealer (AD) bank**.
• SEZ units follow the specified Development Commissioner route.

And EDF is not the only change.

The new framework also revises:
🔹 Export realisation timelines
🔹 Set-off of export receivables against import payables
🔹 Third-party receipts and payments
🔹 Monitoring and reporting through AD banks
🔹 Treatment of outstanding export receivables

**What should businesses do now?**

✅ Identify all overseas service contracts
✅ Prepare a monthly foreign-service invoice tracker
✅ Map EDF filing responsibilities with your AD bank
✅ Review outstanding export receivables/payables
✅ Revisit any group-company or third-party netting arrangements
✅ Clarify the treatment of pre-1 October invoices with your AD bank/FEMA adviser

**The important date: 1 October 2026.**

If your business has international service transactions, don't wait until the first EDF becomes due to understand the process.

🚨 Can a GST adjudicating authority impose a penalty that was never proposed against the taxpayer in the SCN?The Gujarat ...
25/09/2026

🚨 Can a GST adjudicating authority impose a penalty that was never proposed against the taxpayer in the SCN?

The Gujarat High Court has answered: No.

In M/s Tamir Enterprise, the Court dealt with a situation where the adjudicating authority imposed a penalty under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act on the petitioner, even though the SCN had proposed that penalty against another person.

The Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

📌 The key principle:
An adjudicating authority cannot travel beyond the allegations and proposals contained in the Show Cause Notice.

A taxpayer must know what allegation is being made, what provision is being invoked, and what consequence or penalty is proposed, so that an effective opportunity to defend can be provided.

In simple terms:

SCN → Opportunity to respond → Adjudication → Order

The final order cannot introduce a new penalty against a person when that penalty was never proposed against that person in the SCN.

This is an important reminder that natural justice and procedural fairness are not merely technical requirements—they form an essential part of adjudication.

For taxpayers and professionals handling GST proceedings, the SCN should therefore be examined carefully before responding to the allegations.

Vizttax Services Private Limited

🌐 FEMA Update | A significant change for India’s exporters & importers from 1 October 2026If your business regularly rec...
24/09/2026

🌐 FEMA Update | A significant change for India’s exporters & importers from 1 October 2026

If your business regularly receives export payments, makes overseas payments, or maintains open export/import transactions, 1 October 2026 is a date worth putting on your compliance calendar.

RBI’s new Export–Import Regulations, 2026 are set to simplify and provide greater flexibility in several areas of foreign trade compliance.

Some of the key changes include:

🔹 Unified regulatory framework for export and import transactions
🔹 Single EDF replacing multiple export declaration filings
🔹 Longer timelines for export realisation
🔹 Greater flexibility in import payment timelines
🔹 Broader possibilities for set-off of export receivables against import payables
🔹 Greater discretion for Authorised Dealer (AD) banks in dealing with genuine cases of delay

But here is the important part:

Regulatory flexibility does not mean compliance can be ignored.

Businesses should start reviewing their existing transactions before the new framework takes effect.

📌 What should you review now?

• Pending EDPMS / IDPMS entries
• Outstanding export receivables and import payables
• Existing export/import contracts and payment terms
• Delayed or ageing transactions requiring AD-bank intervention
• Internal processes for tracking foreign currency receivables and payments

For businesses engaged in international trade, the transition is not just about understanding the new regulations. It is about ensuring that your contracts, documentation, banking records and internal compliance systems are ready for the change.

Link of Notification

https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=13277&Mode=0

Can an Audit Report become a Recovery Notice?This is a situation many GST taxpayers and professionals encounter:The GST ...
23/09/2026

Can an Audit Report become a Recovery Notice?

This is a situation many GST taxpayers and professionals encounter:

The GST audit is completed.

FORM GST ADT-02 arrives with a tax figure.

Then comes the call:

"Please pay the amount through DRC-03 and close the matter."

But there is an important question:

Has the liability actually been determined?

Under Section 65(6) of the CGST Act read with Rule 101(5), the proper officer communicates the audit findings through FORM GST ADT-02.

But an audit finding is not necessarily the same thing as an adjudicated demand.

Where tax is alleged to have been unpaid or short-paid, the statutory mechanism under Section 73 or Section 74 involves a Show Cause Notice, an opportunity to respond, and an order determining the liability.

And that raises a practical question:

If there is no SCN and no adjudication order, what exactly is being recovered?

This becomes particularly important when the limitation period for the relevant financial year is approaching.

A closing limitation period, by itself, does not appear to convert an audit finding into an adjudicated demand. If the statutory period for initiating proceedings expires, the department cannot simply bypass the prescribed adjudication mechanism merely because an audit finding exists.

The Bombay High Court recently considered this issue in:

M/s. SVS Aqua Technologies LLP v. Superintendent, Range IV, Division I, CGST Pune-II Commissionerate & Ors.

Order dated 31 August 2026.

Interestingly, the taxpayer did not succeed in the case. The Court observed that the apprehension of immediate recovery was misconceived and premature, as the communication was referable to Rule 101(5) and was to be followed by statutory proceedings.

For taxpayers, three questions therefore become critical when an ADT-02 is received:

1️⃣ Has an SCN been issued?
2️⃣ Under which statutory provision?
3️⃣ Has an order actually determined the liability?

Can a departmental GST appeal proceed when the disputed amount is below the prescribed monetary limit?A recent GSTAT rul...
22/09/2026

Can a departmental GST appeal proceed when the disputed amount is below the prescribed monetary limit?

A recent GSTAT ruling highlights an important point for taxpayers and tax professionals.

In the case, the Department filed an appeal involving an IGST penalty of ₹6.16 lakh.

However, the applicable monetary threshold for departmental appeals was ₹20 lakh.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground of maintainability, without entering into the merits of the underlying dispute.

🔎 What makes this significant?

The Tribunal observed that merely obtaining the Commissioner’s approval to file an appeal does not automatically override the prescribed monetary limit.

Where the Department seeks to maintain an appeal despite the threshold, it must establish that the matter falls within one of the specified exceptions to the monetary-limit policy.

📌 The practical takeaway

A departmental appeal is not necessarily maintainable simply because the competent authority has approved its filing.

The monetary-limit requirement and applicable exceptions must also be examined.

For taxpayers, this reinforces the importance of checking the maintainability of an appeal at the threshold stage, before getting into the substantive merits of the dispute.

Have you come across a GST appeal where the monetary limit itself became the deciding factor?

Vizttax Services Private Limited

🔴 Supplier accused of fake billing — Can a genuine purchaser be arrested?This question came up before the Karnataka High...
22/09/2026

🔴 Supplier accused of fake billing — Can a genuine purchaser be arrested?

This question came up before the Karnataka High Court in Abdul Majid & Ors. v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

Three registered scrap dealers had purchased aluminium scrap from GST-registered suppliers. They had:

✅ Tax invoices
✅ Bank payments including GST
✅ GST returns
✅ Purchase and sales records

Later, the Department alleged that the suppliers were fictitious and had issued invoices without actual supply of goods.

The purchasers were summoned and apprehended arrest under Section 132 of the CGST Act.

⚖️ What did the Court consider?

The fact that a supplier is subsequently cancelled, becomes non-existent, or is accused of issuing fake invoices does not automatically make the purchaser guilty.

The Court noted that the purchasers had documents supporting their transactions and that custodial interrogation was not ordinarily necessary merely to investigate the allegations.

But there is an important catch. 👇

📦 An invoice + bank payment is NOT the complete defence.

The purchaser should also be able to demonstrate actual movement and receipt of goods through evidence such as:

➡️ E-way bills
➡️ Transport/LR records
➡️ Weighbridge slips
➡️ Stock registers
➡️ Corresponding sales records
➡️ Other evidence establishing physical receipt

If the Department has prima facie material suggesting fraud, collusion or fictitious transactions, the position can change significantly.

🎯 The practical takeaway for businesses:

Don't treat GST compliance as merely an invoice-and-payment exercise.

For every major purchase, preserve the complete transaction trail — order → invoice → payment → transportation → receipt → stock → subsequent sale.

That documentation can become critical if the supplier is later investigated for fake invoicing.

The purchasers in this case were granted anticipatory bail, subject to conditions.

📚 Abdul Majid & Ors. v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Crl. P. Nos. 9260, 9244 & 9306 of 2026, Karnataka High Court, 05.08.2026.

𝗚𝗦𝗧 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟭𝟮𝟴𝗔: 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗠𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗬 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗣? ⚖️Section 128A has provided significant relief from interest and penalty ...
21/09/2026

𝗚𝗦𝗧 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟭𝟮𝟴𝗔: 𝗪𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗠𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗬 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗣? ⚖️

Section 128A has provided significant relief from interest and penalty in eligible Section 73 matters. But recent 2026 rulings highlight an important point:

👉 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗺𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗲𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀.

📌 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝗶𝘁 𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 ≠ 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗜𝗧𝗖 𝗔𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁

In 𝗥𝗼𝗱𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗲𝘀, the debit notes related to FY 2018-19, but the disputed ITC was actually availed in December 2020.

GSTAT Bengaluru considered the actual availment of ITC relevant to determining whether the dispute fell within the Section 128A window. Since the ITC was availed after 31.03.2020, the benefit was not available.

📌 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗳-𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗧𝗮𝘅?

In 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗙𝗹𝘂𝗶𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺, the Madras High Court held that unpaid self-assessed tax was not expressly excluded from Section 128A merely because of Section 75(12).

However, there was another crucial issue: ⏳ 𝗥𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝟭𝟲𝟰 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿.

📌 𝗦𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗔𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗟𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀

In 𝗦𝗿𝗶 𝗦𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗮 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗮, the Gauhati High Court held that the power to seal premises under Section 67(4) is linked to gaining access where access is denied. It cannot be used indefinitely after the search is over.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻?

For taxpayers, statutory timelines under Section 128A and Rule 164 need careful attention.

For the Department, statutory powers must remain within the boundaries Parliament has prescribed.

⚖️ Rodman Technologies – 2026 VIL 62 GSTAT BLR

⚖️ Incompressible Fluid Control System – 2026 VIL 867 MAD

⚖️ Sri Surendra Sharma – 2026 VIL 866 GAU

Address

Premise No 06, 1st Floor, Park End, Vikas Marg, Preet Vihar
Delhi
110092

Opening Hours

Monday 10am - 7pm
Tuesday 10am - 7pm
Wednesday 10am - 7pm
Thursday 10am - 7pm
Friday 10am - 7pm
Saturday 10am - 7pm

Telephone

+918506916831

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Vizttax Services Pvt Ltd posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Vizttax Services Pvt Ltd:

Shortcuts

Share